Editorial standards & team

    Crowdscope tracks 40 European crowdlending platforms and has published 6 market analyses. This page explains who is behind that work, which sources are used, how the scoring grid is applied, and how commercial links are handled.

    Public, verifiable data only

    Every figure on Crowdscope — funded volume, investor count, default rate, minimum ticket, secondary-market availability — comes from a platform's own published statistics, its annual accounts, or the register of its national regulator. Nothing is estimated silently: when a platform does not disclose a metric, the cell stays empty rather than being filled with a guess.

    A published, unchanged scoring grid

    All platforms are scored on the same eight weighted criteria (track record, funded volume, investors, secondary market, guarantees, regulation, transparency, cash drag). The grid and its weights are public on the methodology page and are applied identically to every platform, whether or not it has an affiliate programme.

    Continuous review, dated pages

    Platform pages are re-reviewed when a material event occurs — a licence change, a payment freeze, a rebranding, a change in originator solvency — and at least quarterly otherwise. Each page shows the date of its last review so you can judge for yourself how fresh the analysis is.

    Independence and disclosure of incentives

    Some links on this site are referral links, and they are labelled as such (rel="sponsored nofollow"). A referral agreement never changes a score, a ranking, or the wording of a risk warning. Platforms flagged as high risk keep that flag even when a partnership exists, and pages with no commercial relationship state it explicitly.

    Experience behind the reviews

    • Active personal capital deployed across P2P marketplaces, SME lending and real-estate crowdfunding platforms in Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, France and Bulgaria since 2019.
    • Direct experience of platform failures and recovery processes, which is what informs the weighting given to guarantees, regulation and liquidity in the scoring grid.
    • Weekly monitoring of ECSP registers, platform financial statements, loan-originator reporting and investor communities to detect early warning signals.
    • A weekly newsletter, Crowdlending Week in Review, summarising platform news, incidents and regulatory moves.

    Corrections and right of reply: crowdscope.eu@gmail.com

    Editorial policy — frequently asked questions

    Who writes the analyses published on Crowdscope?

    Crowdscope is written and maintained by its editorial team, a group of individual European crowdlending investors who have been investing on P2P and real-estate lending platforms since 2019 and who track platform disclosures, regulatory registers and community reports on a weekly basis.

    Is Crowdscope independent from the platforms it reviews?

    Yes. Crowdscope is not owned by, funded by, or editorially controlled by any lending platform. Part of the site's running costs is covered by referral links, which are always labelled, and which have no influence on scores, rankings or risk warnings.

    How often is the data updated?

    Platform data is refreshed at least quarterly and immediately after any material event (regulatory change, withdrawal freeze, insolvency of a loan originator, rebranding). Every page carries a visible last-updated date and a machine-readable dateModified field.

    How can I report an error or an outdated figure?

    Email crowdscope.eu@gmail.com with the page concerned and the source of the correct figure. Corrections that affect a score are applied and the page's review date is updated.

    Is Crowdscope investment advice?

    No. Crowdscope publishes factual analysis and comparative scoring for information purposes only. It is not regulated investment advice, and crowdlending carries a risk of partial or total capital loss.

    Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team