Swaper vs Viainvest
Head-to-head comparison of Swaper (82/100) and Viainvest (61/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Swaper | Viainvest |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdscope score | 82/100 | 61/100 |
| Country | Estonia | Latvia |
| Founded | 2016 | 2016 |
| Loan types | P2P marketplace | Consumer lending |
| Indicative yield | 13.8% | 11% |
| Default rate | 0% | 1.2% |
| Regulatory status | Non régulé ECSP | Investment firm (FCMC) |
| Minimum investment | 10 € | 50 € |
| Cumulative funded volume | 1,065,000,000 € | 750,000,000 € |
| Registered investors | 10,600 | 47,000 |
| Secondary market | Yes | No |
| Auto-invest | Yes | Yes |
| Guarantees | Buyback | Buyback |
Crowdscope verdict
Swaper takes the higher Crowdscope score (82/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.
Swaper vs Viainvest — frequently asked questions
Swaper or Viainvest: which one should you choose?
On the Crowdscope framework, Swaper scores higher (82/100 versus 61/100). Swaper advertises around 13.8% with a 0% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime, while Viainvest advertises around 11% with a 1.2% default rate under the Investment firm (FCMC) regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.
Which of Swaper and Viainvest offers the higher yield?
Swaper advertises the higher indicative yield (13.8% versus 11%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.
Which platform is more liquid, Swaper or Viainvest?
Swaper operates a secondary market while Viainvest does not, which makes early exits easier on the former.
Can you invest on both Swaper and Viainvest?
Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.
Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team