Robocash vs Viainvest
Head-to-head comparison of Robocash (58/100) and Viainvest (61/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Robocash | Viainvest |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdscope score | 58/100 | 61/100 |
| Country | Croatia | Latvia |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Loan types | Consumer lending | Consumer lending |
| Indicative yield | 12% | 11% |
| Default rate | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Regulatory status | Non régulé ECSP | Investment firm (FCMC) |
| Minimum investment | 1 € | 50 € |
| Cumulative funded volume | 1,300,000,000 € | 750,000,000 € |
| Registered investors | 42,000 | 47,000 |
| Secondary market | No | No |
| Auto-invest | Yes | Yes |
| Guarantees | Buyback | Buyback |
Crowdscope verdict
Viainvest takes the higher Crowdscope score (61/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.
Robocash vs Viainvest — frequently asked questions
Robocash or Viainvest: which one should you choose?
On the Crowdscope framework, Viainvest scores higher (61/100 versus 58/100). Robocash advertises around 12% with a 1.5% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime, while Viainvest advertises around 11% with a 1.2% default rate under the Investment firm (FCMC) regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.
Which of Robocash and Viainvest offers the higher yield?
Robocash advertises the higher indicative yield (12% versus 11%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.
Which platform is more liquid, Robocash or Viainvest?
Neither platform operates a secondary market: investments must be held to maturity on both.
Can you invest on both Robocash and Viainvest?
Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.
Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team