All platforms

    Robocash vs Income

    Head-to-head comparison of Robocash (58/100) and Income (52/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.

    Side-by-side comparison

    CriterionRobocashIncome
    Crowdscope score58/10052/100
    CountryCroatiaEstonia
    Founded20172020
    Loan typesConsumer lendingP2P marketplace
    Indicative yield12%12.5%
    Default rate1.5%1.8%
    Regulatory statusNon régulé ECSPNon régulé ECSP
    Minimum investment1 €10 €
    Cumulative funded volume1,300,000,000 €227,000,000 €
    Registered investors42,00010,000
    Secondary marketNoNo
    Auto-investYesYes
    GuaranteesBuybackBuyback, Cashflow Buffer

    Crowdscope verdict

    Robocash takes the higher Crowdscope score (58/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.

    Robocash vs Income — frequently asked questions

    Robocash or Income: which one should you choose?

    On the Crowdscope framework, Robocash scores higher (58/100 versus 52/100). Robocash advertises around 12% with a 1.5% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime, while Income advertises around 12.5% with a 1.8% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.

    Which of Robocash and Income offers the higher yield?

    Income advertises the higher indicative yield (12.5% versus 12%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.

    Which platform is more liquid, Robocash or Income?

    Neither platform operates a secondary market: investments must be held to maturity on both.

    Can you invest on both Robocash and Income?

    Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.

    Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team