All platforms

    PeerBerry vs Ventus Energy

    Head-to-head comparison of PeerBerry (77/100) and Ventus Energy (30/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.

    Side-by-side comparison

    CriterionPeerBerryVentus Energy
    Crowdscope score77/10030/100
    CountryCroatiaEstonia
    Founded20172023
    Loan typesP2P marketplaceRenewable energy / Forestry
    Indicative yield9%18%
    Default rate0%0%
    Regulatory statusNon régulé ECSPNon régulé ECSP
    Minimum investment10 €1000 €
    Cumulative funded volume3,300,000,000 €89,000,000 €
    Registered investors117,0004,500
    Secondary marketYesNo
    Auto-investYesNo
    GuaranteesBuyback, Group guaranteeNantissement actifs énergétiques

    Crowdscope verdict

    PeerBerry takes the higher Crowdscope score (77/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.

    PeerBerry vs Ventus Energy — frequently asked questions

    PeerBerry or Ventus Energy: which one should you choose?

    On the Crowdscope framework, PeerBerry scores higher (77/100 versus 30/100). PeerBerry advertises around 9% with a 0% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime, while Ventus Energy advertises around 18% with a 0% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.

    Which of PeerBerry and Ventus Energy offers the higher yield?

    Ventus Energy advertises the higher indicative yield (18% versus 9%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.

    Which platform is more liquid, PeerBerry or Ventus Energy?

    PeerBerry operates a secondary market while Ventus Energy does not, which makes early exits easier on the former.

    Can you invest on both PeerBerry and Ventus Energy?

    Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.

    Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team