PeerBerry vs Swaper
Head-to-head comparison of PeerBerry (77/100) and Swaper (82/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | PeerBerry | Swaper |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdscope score | 77/100 | 82/100 |
| Country | Croatia | Estonia |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Loan types | P2P marketplace | P2P marketplace |
| Indicative yield | 9% | 13.8% |
| Default rate | 0% | 0% |
| Regulatory status | Non régulé ECSP | Non régulé ECSP |
| Minimum investment | 10 € | 10 € |
| Cumulative funded volume | 3,300,000,000 € | 1,065,000,000 € |
| Registered investors | 117,000 | 10,600 |
| Secondary market | Yes | Yes |
| Auto-invest | Yes | Yes |
| Guarantees | Buyback, Group guarantee | Buyback |
Crowdscope verdict
Swaper takes the higher Crowdscope score (82/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.
PeerBerry vs Swaper — frequently asked questions
PeerBerry or Swaper: which one should you choose?
On the Crowdscope framework, Swaper scores higher (82/100 versus 77/100). PeerBerry advertises around 9% with a 0% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime, while Swaper advertises around 13.8% with a 0% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.
Which of PeerBerry and Swaper offers the higher yield?
Swaper advertises the higher indicative yield (13.8% versus 9%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.
Which platform is more liquid, PeerBerry or Swaper?
Both platforms operate a secondary market, so positions can be listed for sale before maturity — subject to buyer demand.
Can you invest on both PeerBerry and Swaper?
Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.
Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team