PeerBerry vs Iuvo Group
Head-to-head comparison of PeerBerry (77/100) and Iuvo Group (72/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | PeerBerry | Iuvo Group |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdscope score | 77/100 | 72/100 |
| Country | Croatia | Estonia |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Loan types | P2P marketplace | P2P marketplace |
| Indicative yield | 9% | 9.2% |
| Default rate | 0% | 2.8% |
| Regulatory status | Non régulé ECSP | Non régulé ECSP |
| Minimum investment | 10 € | 10 € |
| Cumulative funded volume | 3,300,000,000 € | 1,000,000,000 € |
| Registered investors | 117,000 | 60,000 |
| Secondary market | Yes | Yes |
| Auto-invest | Yes | Yes |
| Guarantees | Buyback, Group guarantee | Buyback |
Crowdscope verdict
PeerBerry takes the higher Crowdscope score (77/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.
PeerBerry vs Iuvo Group — frequently asked questions
PeerBerry or Iuvo Group: which one should you choose?
On the Crowdscope framework, PeerBerry scores higher (77/100 versus 72/100). PeerBerry advertises around 9% with a 0% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime, while Iuvo Group advertises around 9.2% with a 2.8% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.
Which of PeerBerry and Iuvo Group offers the higher yield?
Iuvo Group advertises the higher indicative yield (9.2% versus 9%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.
Which platform is more liquid, PeerBerry or Iuvo Group?
Both platforms operate a secondary market, so positions can be listed for sale before maturity — subject to buyer demand.
Can you invest on both PeerBerry and Iuvo Group?
Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.
Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team