PeerBerry vs ClubFunding
Head-to-head comparison of PeerBerry (77/100) and ClubFunding (60/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | PeerBerry | ClubFunding |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdscope score | 77/100 | 60/100 |
| Country | Croatia | France |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| Loan types | P2P marketplace | Real estate |
| Indicative yield | 9% | 9.5% |
| Default rate | 0% | 0% |
| Regulatory status | Non régulé ECSP | ECSP |
| Minimum investment | 10 € | 1000 € |
| Cumulative funded volume | 3,300,000,000 € | 1,800,000,000 € |
| Registered investors | 117,000 | 42,000 |
| Secondary market | Yes | No |
| Auto-invest | Yes | No |
| Guarantees | Buyback, Group guarantee | Hypothèque, Caution, Garantie à première demande |
Crowdscope verdict
PeerBerry takes the higher Crowdscope score (77/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.
PeerBerry vs ClubFunding — frequently asked questions
PeerBerry or ClubFunding: which one should you choose?
On the Crowdscope framework, PeerBerry scores higher (77/100 versus 60/100). PeerBerry advertises around 9% with a 0% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime, while ClubFunding advertises around 9.5% with a 0% default rate under the ECSP regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.
Which of PeerBerry and ClubFunding offers the higher yield?
ClubFunding advertises the higher indicative yield (9.5% versus 9%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.
Which platform is more liquid, PeerBerry or ClubFunding?
PeerBerry operates a secondary market while ClubFunding does not, which makes early exits easier on the former.
Can you invest on both PeerBerry and ClubFunding?
Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.
Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team