All platforms

    Mintos vs Indemo

    Head-to-head comparison of Mintos (87/100) and Indemo (43/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.

    Side-by-side comparison

    CriterionMintosIndemo
    Crowdscope score87/10043/100
    CountryLatviaLatvia
    Founded20152022
    Loan typesP2P marketplaceReal estate
    Indicative yield10.8%20%
    Default rate10%0%
    Regulatory statusInvestment firm (FCMC)IBF Lettonie
    Minimum investment10 €10 €
    Cumulative funded volume12,500,000,000 €30,000,000 €
    Registered investors600,00020,500
    Secondary marketYesNo
    Auto-investYesYes
    GuaranteesBuyback, Group guaranteeNone disclosed

    Crowdscope verdict

    Mintos takes the higher Crowdscope score (87/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.

    Mintos vs Indemo — frequently asked questions

    Mintos or Indemo: which one should you choose?

    On the Crowdscope framework, Mintos scores higher (87/100 versus 43/100). Mintos advertises around 10.8% with a 10% default rate under the Investment firm (FCMC) regime, while Indemo advertises around 20% with a 0% default rate under the IBF Lettonie regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.

    Which of Mintos and Indemo offers the higher yield?

    Indemo advertises the higher indicative yield (20% versus 10.8%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.

    Which platform is more liquid, Mintos or Indemo?

    Mintos operates a secondary market while Indemo does not, which makes early exits easier on the former.

    Can you invest on both Mintos and Indemo?

    Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.

    Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team