Mintos vs Beebonds
Head-to-head comparison of Mintos (87/100) and Beebonds (57/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Mintos | Beebonds |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdscope score | 87/100 | 57/100 |
| Country | Latvia | Belgium |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Loan types | P2P marketplace | Real estate, Business lending |
| Indicative yield | 10.8% | 7.8% |
| Default rate | 10% | 1.5% |
| Regulatory status | Investment firm (FCMC) | ECSP |
| Minimum investment | 10 € | 100 € |
| Cumulative funded volume | 12,500,000,000 € | 80,000,000 € |
| Registered investors | 600,000 | 14,000 |
| Secondary market | Yes | No |
| Auto-invest | Yes | No |
| Guarantees | Buyback, Group guarantee | Hypothèque, Caution |
Crowdscope verdict
Mintos takes the higher Crowdscope score (87/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.
Mintos vs Beebonds — frequently asked questions
Mintos or Beebonds: which one should you choose?
On the Crowdscope framework, Mintos scores higher (87/100 versus 57/100). Mintos advertises around 10.8% with a 10% default rate under the Investment firm (FCMC) regime, while Beebonds advertises around 7.8% with a 1.5% default rate under the ECSP regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.
Which of Mintos and Beebonds offers the higher yield?
Mintos advertises the higher indicative yield (10.8% versus 7.8%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.
Which platform is more liquid, Mintos or Beebonds?
Mintos operates a secondary market while Beebonds does not, which makes early exits easier on the former.
Can you invest on both Mintos and Beebonds?
Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.
Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team