All platforms

    Bondora vs Maclear

    Head-to-head comparison of Bondora (78/100) and Maclear (62/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.

    Side-by-side comparison

    CriterionBondoraMaclear
    Crowdscope score78/10062/100
    CountryEstoniaSwitzerland
    Founded20082022
    Loan typesConsumer lendingBusiness lending
    Indicative yield6%14.5%
    Default rate0%0%
    Regulatory statusCredit institutionNon régulé ECSP
    Minimum investment1 €50 €
    Cumulative funded volume2,000,000,000 €100,000,000 €
    Registered investors511,00035,000
    Secondary marketNoYes
    Auto-investYesNo
    GuaranteesNone disclosedCaution

    Crowdscope verdict

    Bondora takes the higher Crowdscope score (78/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.

    Bondora vs Maclear — frequently asked questions

    Bondora or Maclear: which one should you choose?

    On the Crowdscope framework, Bondora scores higher (78/100 versus 62/100). Bondora advertises around 6% with a 0% default rate under the Credit institution regime, while Maclear advertises around 14.5% with a 0% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.

    Which of Bondora and Maclear offers the higher yield?

    Maclear advertises the higher indicative yield (14.5% versus 6%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.

    Which platform is more liquid, Bondora or Maclear?

    Maclear operates a secondary market while Bondora does not, which makes early exits easier on the former.

    Can you invest on both Bondora and Maclear?

    Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.

    Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team