Bondora vs Iuvo Group
Head-to-head comparison of Bondora (78/100) and Iuvo Group (72/100): yields, default rates, guarantees, secondary market, regulation and minimum investment.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Bondora | Iuvo Group |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdscope score | 78/100 | 72/100 |
| Country | Estonia | Estonia |
| Founded | 2008 | 2016 |
| Loan types | Consumer lending | P2P marketplace |
| Indicative yield | 6% | 9.2% |
| Default rate | 0% | 2.8% |
| Regulatory status | Credit institution | Non régulé ECSP |
| Minimum investment | 1 € | 10 € |
| Cumulative funded volume | 2,000,000,000 € | 1,000,000,000 € |
| Registered investors | 511,000 | 60,000 |
| Secondary market | No | Yes |
| Auto-invest | Yes | Yes |
| Guarantees | None disclosed | Buyback |
Crowdscope verdict
Bondora takes the higher Crowdscope score (78/100) in this head-to-head, driven by its mix of track record, regulation, guarantees and liquidity. Scores measure structural robustness, not expected return — capital is at risk on both platforms and diversifying across several operators remains the primary risk-control tool.
Bondora vs Iuvo Group — frequently asked questions
Bondora or Iuvo Group: which one should you choose?
On the Crowdscope framework, Bondora scores higher (78/100 versus 72/100). Bondora advertises around 6% with a 0% default rate under the Credit institution regime, while Iuvo Group advertises around 9.2% with a 2.8% default rate under the Non régulé ECSP regime. The right choice depends on whether you prioritise yield, liquidity or regulatory protection.
Which of Bondora and Iuvo Group offers the higher yield?
Iuvo Group advertises the higher indicative yield (9.2% versus 6%). A higher advertised yield usually reflects higher credit or liquidity risk, not a better product.
Which platform is more liquid, Bondora or Iuvo Group?
Iuvo Group operates a secondary market while Bondora does not, which makes early exits easier on the former.
Can you invest on both Bondora and Iuvo Group?
Yes. Diversifying across several platforms is a common way to limit platform-failure risk, since it spreads exposure across different originators, jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Capital remains at risk on both.
Last updated: · Reviewed by the Crowdscope editorial team